Supervisors Balk At Dulles World Project Changes - Leesburg Today Online—Daily News Coverage of Loudoun County, Leesburg, Ashburn: News

May 6, 2015
default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Supervisors Balk At Dulles World Project Changes

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:57 pm | Updated: 11:33 am, Mon Apr 15, 2013.

The owners of the property that will anchor the southern portion of Rt. 28 in Loudoun are looking to make some changes to the timing of their development, but those requests are not being met favorably by the Board of Supervisors.

After receiving support from the Planning Commission, the Dulles World developers faced a series of pointed questions and doubting comments from supervisors during a public hearing Wednesday about their plans to accelerate construction on the multi-family residential units approved in their plan and reduce the minimum required amount of “pedestrian-oriented businesses” in the planned Town Center from 70 percent to 60 percent.

“This is a bit of a bait and switch,” Vice Chairman Shawn Williams (R-Broad Run) said. “You came in and sold the county that we were going to have this great tax base.”

The board will hammer out the details during the May Transportation/Land Use Committee meeting.

Dulles World was approved by the previous Board of Supervisors for more than 3 million square feet of office space; a hotel; more than 400,000 square feet of retail; and 1,265 multi-family units. It was pitched as a premier commercial development project that would capitalize on the proximity of the Metro rail stations, with residential units that would appeal to the young professional, thereby limiting the impact on schools and other county resources.

The 1,265 units are planned to be 900 square feet each and are estimated to create approximately 235 new school children for the county.

The proposed changes would not alter the development totals—only the order and timing of construction.

Under the new request, Dulles World is seeking to break the phasing of their development into several parts. As proposed by the Planning Commission, the first portion of development would allow for up to 475 multi-family residences with no non-residential square footage required. Then developer would be able to build another 275 residential with 500,000 square feet of non-residential, of which 250,000 must be office. Once the developer reaches 1 million square feet of non-residential, 500,000 square feet of which must be office development, they will be able to build an addition 275 residential units. Finally, once 1.5 million square feet of non-residential development is constructed, the final 240 residential units may be built. The remaining development on the property would be non-residential to meet the final build out numbers.

County planners are opposing the changes, saying the project is intended to be a primarily non-residential development and that maintaining that emphasis is important to the growth of businesses in the Rt. 28 corridor.

Supervisors appeared to have the same concerns, but Dulles World’s representative, attorney Colleen Gillis Snow, said the changes were needed to respond to the market and bring the project online in a timely fashion.

“We have grave concerns, when you take into consideration that you have limited to no amenities in this location, then our ability to attract Class A office, which is what we all want to see here, becomes very challenging,” Snow said.

Snow pointed to a Washington Business Journal article that showed the commercial market at a large deficit and said the developer is looking for ways to bring the promised project to fruition. She noted that it would be important to the county not to have the land sitting empty for years to come.

“This site is within the Rt. 28 tax district and the new Metro tax districts,” she said. “Delivery of development on this site is important to funding that tax district, which is important to all of us.”

But supervisors questioned why Dulles World needed changes so close on the heels of its 2011 approval, and many echoed Williams’ concerns of a “bait and switch.”

“It seems awful early to me to throw in the towel,” Supervisor Matt Letourneau (R-Dulles) said, adding that if residential was needed to make the project viable in the market, that “should have been the application when it came before the board in March 2011.”

Chairman Scott K. York (R-At Large), who supported Dulles World as a member of the last board, told the developer to “have patience.”

“Two years ago was yesterday for me and I don’t want to work on it tomorrow,” he said.

Supervisor Ralph Buona (R-Ashburn) went even further to question developers’ overall approach to the board and is pro-economic development attitude.

“I think there are a lot of developers trying to push this board to change or re-phase projects. You’re not the first,” he said. But he joined his other board members in saying that he was unlikely to support the changes “unless some miracle comes out of [committee].”

Many supervisors also expressed concern over the overall impact the changes would have on the county—particularly the school system—and whether this would set up a situation in which the commercial development would never be built.

“You folks are close enough to the board’s business to see what has been going on with respect to roads, with respect to schools and we are in a dire situation trying to catch up,” Supervisor Janet Clarke (R-Blue Ridge) said, continuing, “We have to look at the overall impact to the community, quality of life, what is being done, what can be done to mitigate the impacts that have already occurred. It costs this county money for residential units. There are a lot of things that need to change and be fixed [in this application].”

Only Supervisor Ken Reid (R-Leesburg) appeared open to the changes, noting he was going to be the “skunk at the picnic,” and he encouraged the members of the Transportation/Land Use Committee to “keep an open mind.”

“The plan around Metro stations is to have residential mixed use,” he said. “Let’s not just completely thumb our nose at this…we’re going to have high density development at all these Metro stations throughout the corridor, and that includes residential…or else when the Rt. 606 proposal comes in to build residential within earshot of the jet noise, what are we going to do then?”

Welcome to the discussion.


  • gbay926 posted at 3:15 pm on Fri, Apr 12, 2013.

    gbay926 Posts: 129

    In my view, this project had the aura of bait and switch plus disregard for the problems of residential of any kind at that location. Students will have to be bussed through Herndon (on Elden) or put onto Route 28 to get to and from school. I voted against this development during my time on planning...sadly my apprehensions are taking place. Watch for more "revisions".

  • Bob_Smith posted at 2:40 pm on Fri, Apr 12, 2013.

    Bob_Smith Posts: 438

    If the 7 new Supes are finally clueing into how the proffered zoning game is played, they can surely ask their Planning folks of the legacy of such bait and switch tactics. Eastern loudoun is dotting with the projects that morphed after the initial zoning approval from what was promised, to something different, and the common denominator is residential coming first. It's a systematic process of the development field still viewing Loudoun as a bedroom to FFX and the District. The legacy includes an overwhelming level of support by those whose polo's have elephant emblems. This all R Board is showing some signs of thinking of Loudouners and their best interests first, but no level of support for such changes will ever work to tip the scale of the rooftops dominating the economy of Loudoun. The COunty is closing on getting to the point where just the scraps of land are left, and it's far easier to squeeze in residential projects than non-residential ones when filling in the gaps. These large projects, they must develop as originally promised, or change to the be even more non-residential, or the incremental hacking away will permanently place Loudoun as the bedroom of choice in the region.

  • LoCo Wonders posted at 11:58 am on Fri, Apr 12, 2013.

    LoCo Wonders Posts: 95

    Gee, it seems these "bait and switch" developments are par for the course in Loudoun. (see: new baseball stadium, HS-8, Lansdowne townhomes, etc, etc, etc) I guess the developer needs to blow the lock off his wallet and make some campaign contributions!

  • Buffacuse posted at 11:10 am on Fri, Apr 12, 2013.

    Buffacuse Posts: 547

    I don't know Frank...maybe the right palms haven't been greased yet on this one...

  • Frank Reynolds posted at 10:11 pm on Thu, Apr 11, 2013.

    Frank Reynolds Posts: 621

    Soon, a 9-0 vote approving it. Concerns just magically disappear. They didn't blink an eye at moving a stadium and allowing Kincora to build more homes instead.